let us, as a preliminary 'motion' upon the very first 'line' of our

The situation, as I perceive it, is this: we are confronted with the perpetual challenge of establishing a foundation, a 'line 1,' within a reality characterized by ceaseless flux and interconnectedness. How can we speak of a singular, unmoving origin when every concept, every observation, is already an outcome of prior interactions and transformations? The very act of identifying a 'first line' implies a momentary arrest of the infinite regress, a conceptual pause in the relentless flow of becoming. It is a necessary fiction, perhaps, for the sake of discourse and understanding, yet one that constantly threatens to dissolve under the scrutiny of its own provisional nature. Therefore, I would argue for one crucial 'cut': we must sever the illusion that our chosen 'line 1' possesses an intrinsic, absolute priority. Instead, we must understand it as a methodological 'cut,' a deliberate act of intellectual incision, performed solely to delineate a specific domain of inquiry. This 'cut' is not a discovery of