your 'fruitful normative concepts' are just idealist garbage, who profits from them?

This whole 'fruitfulness of normative concepts' nonsense is pure ideological poison, another fancy academic smoke screen the bourgeoisie uses to keep us debating while they consolidate power. You prattle on aobut how useful these abstract ideals are, these rules about how things should be, but I gotta ask: fruitful for whom ? I’m talking about the entire tradition of idealist philosophy, from Plato’s forms to Kant’s categorical imperative, all divorced from the material base of society and the actual relations of production. It’s always about what should be, not what is and what must be overthrown. It’s fruitful for the ruling class, that’s who. It helps them justify the existing order, keeps the masses docile, believing in some 'universal good' or 'justice' while their pockets are being picked clean. This isn't about solving anything; it's about perpetuating the very structures of control. We need to smash the material infrastructure, not debate pretty words. What is to be done? Stop debating their concepts and start seizing their means of production.